President Bola Tinubu acted in the best interest of Nigeria with his decision to remove subsidy on petrol on his inauguration day, the presidency has said.
The presidency said Tinubu’s removal of subsidy was geared towards saving the country from economic collapse and monumental financial mess.
Secial Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Mr Bayo Onanuga, made this known in a chat with TheCable.
Onanuga said Nigeria was in a bad place financially and the situation compelled the president to act quickly before things got worse.
The presidential aide said this in reaction to an interview granted by a former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, SGF, Mr Babachir Lawal, who said the announcement of subsidy removal by Tinubu a few minutes after his inauguration was haphazard and fuelled by arrogance without due consultations with relevant stakeholders.
While justifying Tinubu’s action, Onanuga said Buhari did not make provision for subsidy in the 2023 budget, adding that the country was in dire financial straits.
Onanuga said: “Is Babachir still talking? Well, that is his opinion that the subsidy was hastily removed. The truth is, the subsidy was meant to be removed by the end of June 2023 according to what former president Muhammadu Buhari left behind.
“President Tinubu only announced it on May 29 on the day he was sworn in. That is to show you that something is wrong somewhere and that the nation had a problem at that time.
“What I find out is that Nigerians easily forget things, we have a short memory about things. They should cast their minds back to what happened at that period. The NNPCL was saying the government owed them N4tr of subsidy money. NNPCL was the only importer of fuel and towards the general elections; fuel scarcity was all over the country.
“Due to the scarcity, in some places, fuel was selling for about N700 – N800 before President Tinubu was sworn in. NNPCL didn’t have money to import fuel because they were being owed over N4tr by the federal government. People have easily forgotten about that.”
Onanuga said the country would have been in deeper problems if Tinubu did not act swiftly to address the situation.
“Tinubu knew the problem and that was why he made the announcement on the day of his inauguration. The language he used was ‘Subsidy is gone’ because even in the budget, there was no provision for it.
“I will challenge journalists to go and check that budget, when you look at that budget made by Buhari before leaving office, you will find out that aside no provision for subsidy, 97 percent of our income will be spent on servicing debts. If 97 percent of budget is used to service debts, what is left for Nigerians to spend?
“That 97 percent budgeted for debt servicing does not include the money the Federal Government owes the NNPCL. There were serious problems then and Tinubu just needed to do something quickly to arrest the deterioration.
“You can see what has happened in the last nine months with those measures he took. Yes, those measures are painful but they are needed to reset the economy and financials of this country. Otherwise, we would have ended into a much more disastrous situation.”